Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Ethical web advertising: Difference between revisions

From Sterling Argent
Start page
 
Categorize as Opinion
 
Line 12: Line 12:
* Consumers have no way of knowing or appealing the result of a report.
* Consumers have no way of knowing or appealing the result of a report.
* Reviews are not speedy, resulting in harmful, malicious, and fraudulent advertisements being shown to more consumers. The publisher and ad network continue to collect revenue from ad fees.
* Reviews are not speedy, resulting in harmful, malicious, and fraudulent advertisements being shown to more consumers. The publisher and ad network continue to collect revenue from ad fees.
[[Category:Opinions]]

Latest revision as of 23:40, 13 March 2025

What would advertising look like that respects consumers, publishers and marketers? These are rules of thumb that I would use to evaluate web ads.

Features of ethical web advertising

  • Publishers and ad networks manually review all ads before they are published.
  • Consumers have a clear way to provide feedback on ads they see, with a speedy, transparent, and sufficient response from a human being.
  • Marketers can manually select or suppress websites or other properties where their ads are shown

Traits of unethical web advertising

  • Publishers and ad networks do not review any ads, unless they are reported by a consumer.
  • Consumers have no way of knowing or appealing the result of a report.
  • Reviews are not speedy, resulting in harmful, malicious, and fraudulent advertisements being shown to more consumers. The publisher and ad network continue to collect revenue from ad fees.